> Don't worry about hijacking the thread. It's all interesting. The > approach is much wider than the 1800 and Eboni. > > One thing to be sensitive to is potential incompatibilities. I've > been told, for example, that the base I'm using for the Eboni-6 is > not compatible with some modern inksets -- Epson UltraChrome > included. I may have experienced an un-characteristic nozzle clog > when I used Glop and Eboni-6 (older matte-style base) in the same > printer. > > Paul Thanks for your understanding Paul, and yes I thing it's a wide issue. Now one thing I don't fully understand is the multi-pass to lay down GO. At the Dmax point I understand but in other parts of the greyscale I feel you can process GO as an additional partition. Say in a simplified example you have at a given output 25% dark ink and 75% light ink for a 100% coverage. The light ink is 50% density of the dark one. At this specified level you need to apply 20% GO (empirically determined and that's probably a bigger issue). As you know there is not a single mix to deliver this output density : 25% dark and 75% light with light density at 50% dark density is equivalent to 62.5% dark alone. If you have to limit total light and dark coverage to 80% to allow 20% GO and full 100% coverage then you can output 35% light and 45% dark (same 62.5% dark equivalent) together with the 20% GO. That trades GO against granularity but it's a single pass. Correct ? Olivier
Message
Re: 1800-3MK+Glop+PK
2008-02-12 by Olivier
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.