--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mark Savoia <mark@...> wrote: > > Gee, think it has anything to do with kickbacks? > ;) > > Mark > http://www.stillrivereditions.com > > On Feb 18, 2008, at 2:28 PM, SteveZ wrote: > > > What's troubling and confusing is why a company like Wilhelm - who's > > world-wide reputation is unsurpassed in research and testing - does > > not provide ratings for some of the most commonly used, popular > > papers. > > I don't know about kickbacks but I'm sure each paper company must pay the toll to have their respective papers tested. Strangely, most manufacturers have opted not to do this. > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Permanence Ratings for Fine Art Media
2008-02-18 by SteveZ