Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Clarification - Depth of Field and Landscapes

2008-03-08 by Gary Weaver

Good point!!

I have a kodak IR print from the old 3000(big paper) right next to me and maybe a dozen images on the 'puter. The only thing that has selective focus is a head shot of another motobiker sharing the lane. A good part of that cornfield blur is motion at 50-60mph rather than out of focus

The point I was suggesting is that I don't know if a great Boke' glass will work with IR - It's a lot of scattered light. Who's got glass designed for 900Nm??

My strat was to get into the trees and let the IR open-up the shadows.

I have a small collection of color large format digital IR landscapes I lifted from the web (shh..) and I don't see these people working with selective focus.

gar

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 3/7/08 at 9:52 PM Charlie Thomson wrote:

>Lots of us have that disease and Penicillin will not work!
>
>
>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>  From: markleewebb 
>  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
>  Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 8:29 PM
>  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Clarification - Depth of Field and Landscapes
>
>
>  My camera is a Nikon D70 converted by LifePixel (normal conversion).
>
>  Actually, if you look at some of Adam's works, you see very bright 
>  and white foliage and very drak black skies - very much like an IR 
>  image.
>
>  You're right about choice of subject....but that's not just an IR 
>  issue. Any landscape where it's not just a wide field all-inclusive 
>  shot but you're trying to emphasive a particular subject amidst 
>  other competing elements has this challenge.
>
>  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Weaver" 
>  <garww@...> wrote:
>  >
>  > Hi,
>  > 
>  > I've only a can of Kodak IR under my belt and tried unmodified 
>  digital IR.
>  > 
>  > IR is all over the place, so you don't have the same options as 
>  with normal films.
>  > 
>  > Selective focus with this factor and typical wide FOV is problem 
>  prone. To make it effective I think you have to choose the subject 
>  placement carefully and maybe consider morning shooting when only 
>  some things have warmed-up.
>  > 
>  > I can't relate ansel stuff to IR stuff in any which way.
>  > 
>  > And I really don't know about the digital end - you don't indicate 
>  what wavelength your sensor can resolve.
>  > 
>  > gar
>  > 
>  > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>  > 
>  > On 3/7/08 at 3:43 AM markleewebb wrote:
>  > 
>  > >But is it done - and done well- with b&w landscapes? 
>  > >
>  > >Here is why I ask: for landscapes, folks like Ansel Adams taught 
>  that 
>  > >aperture is the first concern. He and other great landscape 
>  artists 
>  > >were very concerned about sharpness and capturing a lot of 
>  detail. He 
>  > >even founded Group f.64 - guess why ! He felt that photography 
>  should 
>  > >take advantage of the nature of the medium and make photographs 
>  with 
>  > >as much depth of field as possible. But in some scenes it's hard 
>  to 
>  > >emphasize a particular tree or group of natural elements because 
>  > >they're not well seperated from other distracting elements around 
>  > >them. That's why I was asking.
>  > >
>  > >If someone has some good examples and web sites with samples they 
>  > >could point me to where the photographer used selective DOF IN A 
>  > >LANDSCAPE - and did it with SUCCESS :) that would help me study 
>  other 
>  > >works and gain some perspective on an alternative technique that 
>  may 
>  > >serve me well. 
>  > >
>  > >Thanks. 
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Watson 
>  > ><bwyg@> wrote:
>  > >>
>  > >> markleewebb wrote:
>  > >> > Question - for shots like this where you are stuck with a 
>  > >background 
>  > >> > of other trees and you have other trees to right and to left 
>  and 
>  > >> > sometimes in foreground - can you ever use DOF to emphasize 
>  your 
>  > >main 
>  > >> > subject? Nail focus on main subject but go very soft using 
>  DOF on, 
>  > >> > say, the background? Is this ever done with landscapes?
>  > >> > 
>  > >> Of course it's "done." Selective focus is just another tool to 
>  use 
>  > >in 
>  > >> expressing one's vision.
>  > >> --
>  > >> Bruce Watson
>  > >>
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
>  resources as
>  > >they are often being updated.
>  > >
>  > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>  > >
>  > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
>  wish to
>  > >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
>  this same
>  > >page.
>  > >
>  > >Please follow these basic guidelines:
>  > >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
>  messages to keep
>  > >them short.
>  > >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
>  flames.
>  > >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
>  > >membership without notice.
>  > >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of 
>  digital B&W
>  > >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
>  removed from
>  > >the membership.
>  > >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules 
>  and
>  > >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the 
>  group Owner
>  > >and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the 
>  Files
>  > >section:
>  > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>  > >
>  > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, 
>  THE PRINT
>  > >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" 
>  AND
>  > >"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE 
>  LIABLE TO
>  > >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL 
>  OR
>  > >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS 
>  OF
>  > >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF 
>  THE 
>  > >"OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP 
>  HAVE BEEN
>  > >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) 
>  THE USE
>  > >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; 
>  (ii)
>  > >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR 
>  DATA; (iii)
>  > >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
>  PRINT
>  > >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, 
>  THE
>  > >PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>  > > 
>  > >Yahoo! Groups Links
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>
>
>
>   
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  No virus found in this incoming message.
>  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
>  Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.6/1317 - Release Date:
>3/7/2008 8:15 AM
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
>they are often being updated.
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
>If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
>unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
>page.
>
>Please follow these basic guidelines:
>- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
>them short.
>- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
>Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
>membership without notice.
>- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
>printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
>the membership.
>- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
>guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
>and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files
>section:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
>BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
>YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND
>�MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
>YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
>EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
>PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE 
>�OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
>ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
>OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
>UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
>STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
>YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
>PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.