Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Scanner or not

2008-04-03 by James Strain

My Microtek 900i lost a solenoid and I then discovered, to my chagrin, that there are no Microtek service facilities in the USA.  I could not recommend Microtek to anyone based on that unhappy (and expensive) experience.  My Nikon Coolscan, on the other hand (the 9000) is humming along merrily.  Jim



----- Original Message ----
From: m revaldi <imnoexis@...>
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2008 3:48:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Scanner or not

try microtek i900 or other type or nikol coolscan

imnoexis! 

----- Original Message ----
From: Richard <cms0009@gmail. com>
To: DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2008 12:48:13 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Scanner or not

Are there any good scanners for 35mm negatives 
or should as, what is the best for 35mm ?

or is all photography pretty much gone to digital.
--

Hate to sell of my Cannon camera

TIA
Richard



____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
You rock. That's why Blockbuster' s offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. 
http://tc.deals. yahoo.com/ tc/blockbuster/ text5.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.