I don't have experience with the Plustek, so can't say. The Nikons and similar film scanners, OTOH, are very difficult (impossible?) to get focus across the whole film plane unless you use a wet-mount holder. A used drum scanner (eg. Howtek 4500) will be your best bet, but you have to have alot of film to make it worth-while. I would recommend getting sample scans from the same wide-gamut negative from several different kinds of scanners (operated by knowledgeable owners!!) before deciding. Bill On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:27 PM, dlruckus <dlruckus@...> wrote: > I've been using the Plustek for several years now and it does a very > good job. Good enough, in fact, to exhibit just how disappointing some > of my 35mm from the past is, technically speaking. 7200 dpi puts a > very pitiless spotlight on any deficits. One of the very early > reviewers, who was published in a UK photo magazine, really trashed > the machine as being inadequate for use because at 7200dpi all his > output looked less than sharp whereas 4000dpi from it as well as from > another brand looked good. My experience with it indicates that he > hadn't a clue as to what he was seeing. At that time it was even more > affordable than today so a review such as his may very well have > curtailed the machines marketing considerably. > > Regards > Duane > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com<DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>, > "pr_roark" > > <pr_roark@...> wrote: > > > > Richard wrote: > > > > > Are there any good scanners for 35mm negatives > > > or should as, what is the best for 35mm ? > > > > David Brooks at Shutterbug tests a lot of these and is very enthused by > > the affordable Plustek 7200i. > > > > My experience is that the typical 4000 dpi of a film scanner cannot > > capture all the detail that is in the film. So, those extra pixels > > just might be significant. > > > > > > > or is all photography pretty much gone to digital. > > > > So far, I see no (affordable) serious digital competition for my medium > > format Tech Pan film when ultimate B&W quality is the issue. For > > color, however, I never shoot film any more. > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > -- Regards, Bill Morse Wm. Morse Editions http://www.MorseEditions.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanner or not
2008-04-03 by Bill Morse
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.