Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

[Digital BW] Re: Scanner or not

2008-04-03 by William John Smith

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Dana H. Myers" 
<dana.myers@...> wrote:
>
> Bill Morse wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > I don't have experience with the Plustek, so can't say. The Nikons and
> > similar film scanners, OTOH, are very difficult (impossible?) to get focus
> > across the whole film plane unless you use a wet-mount holder.
> 
> That's not my experience with the Nikon LS-9000; the glass
> holder gives very good edge-to-edge sharpness without resorting
> to wet-mount.
> 
> Dana


 I have to agree with Dana on this one.  I have been using a 9000 for over two years now 
with the glass carrier, both 35 mm and 120, and the focus is tack sharp.  If the negative is 
clean without scratches then there is no reason to go to all the trouble of wet mounting.  
Once you use glass you never go back.

William

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.