You should see how big the 3800 is before you make your decision. It can't be much smaller than a 4800. That said, I think that you would want a 2400 and just buy inks by the box from someplace like Atlex.com or shades of paper. Don't forget to save the used ink cartridges, Staples offers $3 off new ink cartridges for every used cartridge you bring in. Drew On Apr 19, 2008, at 6:50 AM, Arthur Fink wrote: > I've been printing all my black and white on a pair of Epson 3000's > (one at home, another at work), using MIS UT-FS ink and an old > Piezography driver. Print quality is excellent, but speed is slow > slow, and paper handling is a problem on heavier papers. > > So, I'm getting ready to ditch one or both of these, and move to one > of the K3 printers. That means Epson R2400, 3800, 4800, etc. > > My old Epson R800 bit the dust, and so I also need a printer that I > can take with me to dance festivals or workshops, where I may be in > residence for one to three weeks. My print needs there are less > demanding (mostly color work prints or contacts), but the ability to > carry the printer is important. With that constraint, I'd not get a > 4800 or larger. > > So, I'm left to decide between the R2400 and 3800. The ability of > the 3800 to print 17" x 22" sheets (actually 17 x 25) is nice but not > important. I'm not sure that I'd ever use the narrow roll paper that > the R2400 accepts. From all the reviews I've read, print quality is > comparable. > > With this analysis, the biggest difference for me would be 80 ml ink > carts in the 3800 vs 15 ml in the R2400 -- and a consequent reduction > in ink costs. Since I may print as many as 700 8-1/2" x 11" work > prints on one on-site project, ink cost can add up. In theory, it > seems simple -- carts for the 3800 hold about five times as much ink, > but cost only three or four times as much. I'd assume that the > difference is greater, because much ink is wasted in the smaller > carts. > > However, I'm mindfull of the adage: "In theory, theory and practice > are the same. In practice, they are not." Does my theory hold up? > > Have any of you had experience with both of these printers ... or > with either one ... that would lead you to offer any advice? Any > other differences that I've not mentioned that should be considered? > > (At least initially, I'll use it with regular Epson inks, since I'll > need to print lots of color as well as some black and white.) > > ===> Are you interested in an Epson 3000? Contact me. > I'm in the Portland, Maine, area, and would prefer > not to ship ... but anything is possible. <=== > > Thanks all, > > Arthur Fink > > A r t h u r . F i n k . P h o t o g r a p h y > ------------------------------------------------- > Ten New Island Avenue . land 207.766.5722 > Peaks Island, Maine 04108 . cell 207.615.5722 > www.arthurfinkphoto.com . af@... > > More dance images www.f64gallery.com/arthur.html > www.arthurfinkphoto.com/BatesShow2007 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 3000 vs R2400; probably Epson 3000's for sale
2008-04-19 by Andrew Eschbacher
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.