Hello Gordon, >Assuming OEM (stock) inks & machines in all cases; would some of you >good folks give a judgment of the improvement of the K3 inkset over >the earlier (4000) UltraChrome formula, for both B/W and color >applications? There are several advantages for K3 ink that have been widely reported here with general agreement since it appeared in 2005: less bronzing and gloss differential using PK on glossy papers, three K inks for very smooth tonal gradations, greater fade resistance, super performance on the new fiber glossy papers (and for color printing it seems I've heard there is better gamut as well, maybe someone who knows about that will comment...). In addition to the ink, the K3 printers have the Advanced Black and White mode (ABW) in the driver that's sort of a simple built in RIP that makes BW prints using primarily the three K inks with small amounts of color as toners. The results are excellent with outstanding ease of use. With the 4000 it would require a 3rd party RIP to accomplish similar results. If you already use a RIP then that may not be an issue. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm I-Trak 2.1 http://www.cjcom.net/itrak.htm
Message
Re: UltraChrome (4000) Ink and K3 Compared
2008-04-20 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.