Also how about using Photoflo at a 12-14% levle in the base? Might give a very warm print but might be an interesting look? Or another surfactant like Tween 20 or Triton X-100? --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "the_des_bois" <thedesbois@...> wrote: > > Paul, > > Since I have many carts lying around doing nothing and I love trying > stuff I'll give it a try anyways. ;-) > > I understand the issues with the R & B channels vs the Epson driver. > > Using QTR do you think the Hawk Mountain Condor BW qidf provided with > your Eboni 6 curves and profiles would be a good starting point? > > I,ll let you know if I get banding or not once I've tried stuff for a > while. :) > > Many thanks again, > > > Denis > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark" > <pr_roark@> wrote: > > > > Denis, > > > > > I want to try C-6 in my R1800 (Glycerine USP and Photo-Flo being > > > readily available and very cheap here). > > > > I don't recommend C6 in the 1800. I think you'll have > microbanding. > > The Eboni-6 surfactant is probably strong enough to work well, but > > not Photo Flo. > > > > > > > > > > Where would I place the different dilutions (densities?) in an > > R1800? > > > > I dislike the 1800 Epson driver, so I'd recommend QTR. Then it > > really doesn't matter where you put the different densities. > > > > With the 1800 Epson driver you have to guess what the R and B are > > going to be doing. It's just not worth messing with. > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > > > > > > > > Would it be safe to assume this: > > > > > > R1800 Ink position / C-6 reference > > > MK / Eboni > > > R / C > > > B / M > > > C / LC > > > M / LM > > > Y / Y > > > PK / clear base > > > GL / clear base > > > > > > Thanks for your advice and help, > > > > > > Denis > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark" > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis, > > > > > > > > Eboni-6 should be very smooth in an 1800, but I have not > compared > > it to > > > > what the K7 inkset can do in that printer. These Eboni > > dilutions print > > > > more warmly in the 1.5 pl printers, so I have not had much > > interest in > > > > pursuing them there. But for those who like warm prints, it > > might be > > > > an interesting option. > > > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.PaulRoark.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: Eboni6 in 1800 (was "Carbon-6" Ink Mixing)
2008-05-19 by the_des_bois
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.