SKID Wrote:
>I guess the Brooklyn Museum of Art in NYC, who had one of the defining shows on
>Digital imagery last summer is wrong. ;-)
>The reason there is no mention of 'photography' or 'enlargement' with a 'toned
>silver gelatin print' is that it is understood to be a photograph. 'Oil on
>canvas' or 'Oil on Paper' does not mention the word painting because it's
>understood. If someone got oil paints to go through an inkjet printer, it would
>not be labeled 'oil on paper'.
Wow, I guess because one uses makes an image with a camera, deveops the negative, scans it and "prints" it with a inkjet printer that the final product is not understood to be a photgraph.......
I give up....from now on I am going back to platinum printing. I guess I will be spending a lot of money on allergy pills. I really want to make photographs.
Mike
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Running into inkjet work....
2002-02-09 by Michael Kravit
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.