I have a 2200. It needed a new pump, and since then has been excellent. I don't have a 2400 or a 2880. My evidence is anecdotal and secondhand, but it might be useful. 1. My friend Peggy has had both. She loves the prints from the 2400, but finds a a little cheesier and less reliable than the 2200. 2. When I had the 2200 fixed, by a place that specializes in Epson repair, I spoke for quite a while with the tech mgr about the relative mechanical merits of the various models. He felt that the 2400 was mechanically inferior to the 2200. He thought that the 3800 was excellent mechanically, and that one wanting to upgrade from the 2200 should consider going straight to the 3800 (this was not sales talk - he knew I wasn't in the market right then). As someone pointed out, the cost difference isn't as great as it appears, because a lot more ink comes with the 3800. On Jul 25, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Clayton Jones wrote: > Hello Richard, > >> I've been wondering how the newer Epsons such as the 2400 or the 2880 >> compare with the old ones like the 2100 for reliability. > > My own experience favors the newer. I had a 2200 for almost exactly > two years. One month from the expiration of the 2-year replacement > warranty the paper feed mechanism began serious and noisy > malfunctioning. It clearly had worn out. I swapped it for a 2400 in > August, 2005, so I'm now approaching three years with it. My > experience with it has been fantastic. > > Besides being a dream to use (ABW) and producing beautiful prints with > it's three K inks, it has never had a banding problem, has never > needed a head alignment, and has had only a few relatively minor > clogs, always after being idle for long periods (2-3 weeks). My only > real complaint is sometimes it gets persnickity in feeding paper and > tries my patience. But not always, it comes and goes...maybe it's the > phase of the moon. > > I've also found the ABW settings to be somewhat of a moving target. > The tone often shifts a bit along the green/magenta scale when a new > cart is installed - differences in ink batches I suppose. It's more > of an annoyance than a handicap and I've learned to live with it. A > couple of small test prints tell me how much to adjust the horizontal > value and I'm back in business. > > Anyway, it has by far been the best printer I've ever had (four in a > 6 year period). All of it's use has been with the Epson inks. It > has made countless prints, most of them letter size or smaller, and my > ink costs have averaged about $20/month. I sell prints, so it has > more than paid it's way. > > Before the 2400, printing was mostly a frustrating struggle. With the > 2400 it's been pretty much printing Nirvana. > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm > I-Trak 2.1 http://www.cjcom.net/itrak.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish > to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from > the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the > Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” > AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE > LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE > LOSSES (EVEN IF THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), > RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF > YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD > PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Reliability - old v new Epsons
2008-07-26 by Mitch Greenwald
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.