At 03:22 p.m. Saturday 26/07/2008, you wrote: >One month from the expiration of the 2-year replacement >warranty the paper feed mechanism began serious and noisy >malfunctioning. It clearly had worn out. I swapped it for a 2400 in >August, 2005, so I'm now approaching three years with it. My >experience with it has been fantastic. You swapped it? You must tell me where one can swap an old printer for a new one - in New Zealand all the shops expect us to pay for them :) It's amazing that you've never had a banding problem. In the last couple of days, I've printed something (one was a big panorama) and had banding appear halfway through the print. No laughing matter Were you using OEM ink on your 2200? Whatever ink we use I think paper is the major expense - I'll never go back to MIS as I have enough trouble keeping OEM ink flowing, let alone third party ink. It it true to say that ink flow problems tend to get worse as printers get older? thanks, Richard -- richard smallfield photography http://smallfield.vze.com http://www.photoforum-nz.org/gallery/thumbnails.php?pageID=19&showID=50 "640K ought to be enough for anybody. " --Bill Gates (1955-), in 1981 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Reliability - old v new Epsons
2008-07-26 by Richard Smallfield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.