--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Fielder" <tfielder@...> wrote: > > I've noticed occasional references to Vista and also to XP. Does anyone > have experience with both? Are you able to opine as to which operating > system is best for photos? I see lots of replies, but what I consider the most important issue has not (yet) been covered, and that is availability of drivers. Any hw more than a couple of years old might ot be able to operate under Vista as Vista drivers are not available. This highlights to me one of the serious drawbacks of digital to the serious amateaur. It is not only fully functioning cameras that become obsolete, but also fully functioning printers, etc. Professionals will probably have the throughput that would otherwise require them to replace these peripherals more frequently, and "less serious" amateaurs will probably not have a significant investment in these type of peripherals. So, use Vista, and replace all your essential peripherals! And then you will probably have to do it again a few years down the line with the next version of Window$. I built myself a new PC recently, and I chose XP over Vista for mainly this reason. Steve
Message
Re: Vista v. XP??
2008-08-04 by skefford_1
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.