I expect that Jon has a great ink set. It is just that it is a bit new and untested. I have to say I give him a lot of credit for being honest and forthright about the quality of his inks, and in not stinting in praise of Epson inks. Unlike many of the amateurs that like to slam Epson, etc. and make unfounded claims for the most generic of clone ink sets. ;>) I am using a cheap CIS for my Epson 2200. One of the $50 units off of Ebay. They are probably OK if you get them set up right the first time. Unfortunateky I tinkered with mine a bit, and had every connection and tube come undone. I finally got it working OK, but I would not rely on it too much. I was just playing with the 2200 though, I have 2 7600's and a 9600 for more serious work. Probably worth investing in one of the better CIS' if you are going to use it heavily. The K3 inks can yield a good gloss on the newer baryta papers. Neil Snape has posted a bit on the most recent addition, the Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Baryta (you have to read that name carefully, it is similar to other Hahnemuhle names.) It is supposed to have excellent dmax, no bronzing, no gloss differential, no OBA's. Not yet available in the US though. Otherwise you can achieve excellent reults with the Hahnemuhle Fine Art Baryta, Epson Exhibition Fiber, Harman Glossy FB Ai, or Ilford Gold Silk. They will require spraying and are quite delicate when wet, but really great papers. We are quite lucky to have them. I also like the Innova F type Glossy Warmtone for B&W. It does need spraying to eliminate gloss differential. I have mixed a version of the Epson K3 PK, LK, and LLK inks into a 5K ink set plus GLOP that looks decent. I use a light GLOP on first pass, then a second pass of full GLOP. A method devised by Paul Roark, Tyler, et. al. I stil have to mix a toner for the 7th channel to get the look I want for those inks. That was more of a side project. I still need to figure out a production ink set, probably Cone. Anyway, either Jon's Cone Color inks or the Epson K3 should be able to make a good glossy B&W print with a little extra work. I think the HP Z3100 with the GLOP channel is a little easier, but given that we are running older (and much cheaper) technology the results are wonderful. I hope that is on topic? Best, Michael
Message
Re: [Digital BW] QTR with ConeColor....
2008-08-30 by Michael T. Murphy
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.