Scott, > Hi Paul, > > Are you still shooting film or have you "gone digital"? My main camera is a Bronica RF 645 with the 45 mm lens. I expect it to remain in use for a while. For serious B&W landscape shooting where I want a medium telephoto, I still take the 135 mm lens for the Bronica, but, as I noted just above, I bought a Canon 90mm Tilt Shift lens in anticipation of the new 5D. I've found that 11 x 14 prints with my 8 mp camera are usual fine with a very good medium telephoto. Digital wide angle is still too plagued with artifacts for my liking. So, the 21 mp of the new Canon and the full frame should (I hope) be enough to satisfy my requirements at least when an excellent prime, symetrical lens is used. The 90 TS fits the bill perfectly. I very much miss the tilt of my Rollei SL66. (I still have the system, but it's a heavy and can't handle Tech Pan film well.) So, the 90 TS with a full frame 21 mp DSLR is my ticket back to the perspective I really like the best -- and what is used for the image (Cambria Surf) that is on my home page now. > I shoot mostly digital, and want more maga-pixle. > New cameras coming out soon look interesting. See the post above. > Have you shot any of the microfilms....? No, I have a freezer full to MF Tech Pan, so I'm set for some time to come. A MF TP wide angle shot is going to be very hard for any digital camera that costs less than $20,000 to match. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: OT: Film or digital
2008-09-19 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.