This lens may be one of the best wides available for the 5D II: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08091901carl_zeiss_distagon_t_21mm.asp --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark" <pr_roark@...> wrote: > > Scott, > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > Are you still shooting film or have you "gone digital"? > > My main camera is a Bronica RF 645 with the 45 mm lens. I expect it > to remain in use for a while. > > For serious B&W landscape shooting where I want a medium telephoto, I > still take the 135 mm lens for the Bronica, but, as I noted just > above, I bought a Canon 90mm Tilt Shift lens in anticipation of the > new 5D. > > I've found that 11 x 14 prints with my 8 mp camera are usual fine > with a very good medium telephoto. Digital wide angle is still too > plagued with artifacts for my liking. So, the 21 mp of the new Canon > and the full frame should (I hope) be enough to satisfy my > requirements at least when an excellent prime, symetrical lens is > used. The 90 TS fits the bill perfectly. I very much miss the tilt > of my Rollei SL66. (I still have the system, but it's a heavy and > can't handle Tech Pan film well.) So, the 90 TS with a full frame 21 > mp DSLR is my ticket back to the perspective I really like the best -- > and what is used for the image (Cambria Surf) that is on my home > page now. > > > > I shoot mostly digital, and want more maga-pixle. > > New cameras coming out soon look interesting. > > See the post above. > > > Have you shot any of the microfilms....? > > No, I have a freezer full to MF Tech Pan, so I'm set for some time to > come. A MF TP wide angle shot is going to be very hard for any > digital camera that costs less than $20,000 to match. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com >
Message
Re: OT: Film or digital
2008-09-19 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.