> This lens may be one of the best wides available for the 5D II: > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08091901carl_zeiss_distagon_t_21mm.asp I love seeing competition with the OEM lenses by top optical companies. But, I must say, I have a "legendary Distagon" lens on my SL66, and like all other retro-focus lenses, even when film is used they are second rate compared to symetrical designs. When one adds the digital artifacts to the retrofocus wide angle performance, the results I've seen leaves a fair amount to be desired. What I would like to see is high resolution MTF curves of these lenses. While Canon's low resolution MTF charts are of some value, I have yet to find a substitute for the old Photodo tests and actually trying the lens. Some of the European magazines may have these, but I'm not that familiar with them. I suspect the digital wide angle that will convert me will be a symetrical lens design on a dedicated wide angle rangefinder, 20+ mp camera. Microlenses on the sensor that are matched to the short focal length probably have the best chance of catching MF and larger format film performance, and I think several companies are moving in that direction. Paul www.PaulRoark.com > > <pr_roark@> wrote: > ... > > My main camera is a Bronica RF 645 with the 45 mm lens. > > I expect it to remain in use for a while. > > > > ... but, as I noted just above, I bought a Canon > > 90mm Tilt Shift lens in anticipation of the new 5D. > > > > ... Digital wide angle is still too plagued with artifacts ...
Message
Re: OT: Film or digital
2008-09-19 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.