> > I have a "legendary Distagon" lens on my > > SL66, and like all other retro-focus lenses, even > > when film is used they are second rate compared to > > symetrical designs. It would have been better to say "more symetrical" lens. I'm not sure there are exactly symetrical ones outside, perhaps, 1:1 copy lenses. The typical SLR "retrofocus" lenses, however, have had to stretch the rear lens to film distance beyond what is optimum for most image quality factors, particularly for film shooting, and I can sure see the differences when comparing them to rangefinder wide angles and SLR relatively symetrical "normal" and medium telephoto lenses. > ... they all try to get the angle right at > which the light rays fall on the sensor. Yes, the reality of current sensors has caused companies to try to get those light rays coming in at a more perpendicular angle. That's why I think progress on micro-lenses over the pixels is part of what is needed to get the best digital wide angle images. Of course, I'm speculating. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
[Digital BW] Re: OT: Film or digital
2008-09-19 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.