So Richard you are telling me that all the photographs I saw at exhibitions where reproductions? So sad I feel now knowing this. Should I have asked to see the originals? ;-) Denis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, CorrPro96@... wrote: > > Aren't ALL photographic prints, prints of a photograph... whatever the > printing process is? > > The photograph could be shown as a transparency, or any of a number of > reproduction forms. An inkjet print is a giclee or whatever else we want to call > it. I don't doubt that there will be future designations, but if it is a print, > by definition, it is a reproduction of a photograph, and not the photograph > itself. > > Richard Massie > _www.rmassiephotography.com/photos.php_ > (http://www.rmassiephotography.com/photos.php) > > > > > > **************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial > challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and > calculators. (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001) > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital ...
2008-09-21 by the_des_bois
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.