Digital BW, The Print

They are original prints; each one being different than the last or next.
Even reproduction can vary, but they are not stuck from the master. The
context of the line that got this going was more about deriving a term to
clearly show that these were NOT the original piece but a copy of the
orginal. 

 

… and then reproduced digitally, typically via inkjet printing. First use in
this context by Jack Duganne in 1991, Los Angeles, California. 

 

 I don’t think that copy applies to inkjet as each one, just like each
silver gelatin print, is an individually crafted print. It may be
indistinquishable from the next of the previous, but can a goal when
printing silver gelatin too. So if you want to call your inkjet prints,
giclee it would be an easy case to make a claim that they are all original
Joe Doe prints. The hard part now, with all the scanner, etc to prove that
these other prints over here,  HEY BUDDY – Pist, Yeah YOU!! I got some JOE
DOE prints for ¼ gallery price. Hey, Whada say? Eh! CASH! 

 

And I believe that it is that dubious selling of prints, which we can all
agree to, is the problem with Giclee today NO? 

 

Hahahaha  hohohohoho heheheheh

 

To me it is clear that there are, and will be, different context that will
be equally valid for the non copyrighted term Giclee. 

 

 

 

 

Eric Neilsen Photo

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

214 827-8301

 

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

SKype ejprinter

 

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
CorrPro96@...
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 8:37 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry
mounting digital ...

 


In a message dated 9/20/2008 9:33:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
thedesbois@videotro <mailto:thedesbois%40videotron.ca> n.ca writes:

So Richard you are telling me that all the photographs I saw at
exhibitions where reproductions? So sad I feel now knowing this.

Should I have asked to see the originals? ;-)

Denis 

You could ask to see the negatives....or the transparencies... the 
originals.
If you can make more than one of them.... each is a reproduction,,, No?

Richard

**************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial 
challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips
and 
calculators. (http://www.walletpo
<http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001>
p.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]