Hello Richard, >You could ask to see the negatives....or the transparencies... the >originals. If you can make more than one of them.... each is a >reproduction,,, No? No, not at all. A copy, or reproduction, of the original would look just like the original. A copy of a neg or a tranny (if it's a good copy) would look just like the original and you'd have trouble telling which was which. A copy of a digicam image file looks just like the original image file (whether viewed on screen or analyzed byte for byte). A photographer's print (silver, platinum, gum, photogravure, inkjet, whatever) is the result of a lot of time, effort, expertise and artistic sensitivity which creates something new that is vastly different from the original photographic capture, be it neg, tranny, or digipic. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm I-Trak 2.1 http://www.cjcom.net/itrak.htm
Message
Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital ...
2008-09-21 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.