pr_roark wrote: > It would have been better to say "more symetrical" lens. I'm not > sure there are exactly symetrical ones outside, perhaps, 1:1 copy > lenses. The typical SLR "retrofocus" lenses, however, have had to > stretch the rear lens to film distance beyond what is optimum for > most image quality factors, particularly for film shooting, and I can > sure see the differences when comparing them to rangefinder wide > angles and SLR relatively symetrical "normal" and medium telephoto > lenses. There are plenty of purely symmetrical lenses out there. The view camera world is loaded with them. The classic dialyte, planar, and dagor designs come to mind. There are few symmetrical designs for smaller formats because of the design restrictions placed on lens design by the camera body. Specifically, the lens mount is a fixed distance from the film plane. For shorter lenses this can require a retrofocus design, which is mandatory for SLR cameras (to accommodate mirror travel) but may be used to a lesser degree on rangefinder cameras (to accommodate the shutter mechanism). The fixed position lens mount will also effect the design of longer lenses because of the requirements of focusing in a fixed lens mount. So, in general, smaller format cameras (especially SLR designs) seldom have symmetrical lens designs. This is one of the reasons smaller formats didn't become really popular until after WWII -- when lens coatings improved to the point that the many element asymmetrical lenses became practical. I'm just saying, there are dozens of purely symetrical lens designs in active use today. Just not in small format cameras. LF photographers, from 5x4 up to 24x20, use them every day. I've got three in my pack as we speak. Two I bought new within the last few years, one that dates from the 1950s (a classic Goerz Red Dot Apo-Artar -- a dialyte design). Razor sharp and fully corrected. From an engineering standpoint, these old, simple, sharp, contrasty, highly corrected designs are really elegant. -- Bruce Watson
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT: Film or digital
2008-09-23 by Bruce Watson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.