I just read a very interesting article that Tyler Boley has published on his site. Using highly magnified areas of actual prints he demonstrates the importance of multiple shades of gray inks (and variable dot size) to produce the highest possible resolution in a B&W print. Specifically the comparison is between the ABW Epson driver and 2 RIPs, (the high end StudioPrint and the more affordable and ever popular QTR). The RIPs control 2 quad tone Piezography inksets (from Jon Cone), each of a different hue , loaded together on a 9600. As a bonus we are also given the same image area scanned to the same size from a contact print of the original neg. Despite the shortcomings of the silver print, it still looks more "organic" than anything from an inkjet. Scattered grains of silver form a more pleasing structure than dithered dots. Of course, all this is at a microscopic level and it wouldn't surprise me if many readers find the whole thing irrelevant . Yet, it is fascinating to see what actual prints look like under magnification. As Tyler points out, we don't actually see this level of detail when we look at a print but it sure influences our perception of the image - even if we can't pinpoint the reason. So.... draw your own conclusions! http://tinyurl.com/47efo9 Antonis
Message
How tiny dots determine real resolution in a B&W ink print
2008-09-25 by Antonis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.