<djon43@...> wrote: > > > Edward Weston's prints, seemingly always contacts, were superior ... There's nothing quite like an 8x10 contact. In fact, with the old photos I'm digitally restoring, many seem to be 5x7 contacts. While the "noise" level from the paper positive texture is high, the amount of detail that can be extracted from these old images is wonderful. >...few photographers have ever done letter-size, > much less 16X20 contacts :-) Before inkjets "made the grade" I was using 16 x 20 imagesetter internegatives and contact printing them. The sharpness could be amazing, but what a hassle it was -- and expensive also. No way I'd go back to that workflow. For now, I think inkjets rule when it comes to large display prints. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: How tiny dots determine real resolution in a B&W ink print
2008-09-27 by pr_roark