Peter De Smidt wrote: > So if it's really important to you, make sure to > test you lens when you buy it, if possible against a couple of other new > lenses. Buy the best one. Before getting any new lens it may be a good idea to buy the Imatest software first and test the quality of the lenses you already have and will get. Imatest is no longer cheap though but may prove a good investment for any testing including scanner resolution like I did with the demo version. Erwin Puts thinks there are enough older lenses around that can still perform as good as the latest ones. By cherry picking (with Imatest) a bunch of secondhand FF lenses you could still end with a top quality range. They may not have all the bells and whistles of the new versions but that shouldn't show in the images. Then there are the lenses that perform in all the tests: Sigma 70 mm f2.8 macro, the Tamron 28-75 mm f.2.8, the new Sigma 50mm f1.4. The first two on many bodies. Of course FF wide angles have been less in demand for some time and that will change with 3 FF systems below 3K$. Few sites with user lens reviews are as readable as www.dyxum.com but that one is only for the Alpha mount. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] DSLR sharp? -- was How tiny dots determine real resolution in a B&W ink prin
2008-09-28 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.