gar, amusing, but maybe you missed my point :-) My point: comparing a scan's inkjet to a contact print isn't as relevant as comparing a scan's inkjet to a darkroom enlargemtent. Darkroom enlargements using superior enlarging lenses are more lossey detail-wise than inkjets from reasonably OK scans (eg using Epson flatbeds with 6X7 or 4000ppi Nikon with 35mm). This is most obvious in the corners/edges, but it applies to the center as well. That's one of the reasons inkjets can look wonderful at sizes where enlarged murals turn to mud.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: How tiny dots determine real resolution in a B&W ink print
2008-09-29 by djon43