Digital BW, The Print

Bruce Watson wrote:
> 
> 
> sinar001 wrote:
>  > Very interesting how still photographers can get sucked into "dissing"
>  > what's been added to the camera as a "bonus" not an added cost.
>  >
> What makes you think I've been "sucked into 'dissing?'" In fact I just
> know what I want and I have no interest in video. Why would you assume
> otherwise? And why would you assume that there's no added cost? You
> think Canon does this work for free? Gives the higher speed hardware
> away for nothing? You must be joking. Oh, wait -- I've already made that
> mistake once today. *Are* you joking?

What I expect is Canon is leveraging the work they've done
to improve still capture to provide an additional feature.
My suspicion is that this feature comes at little additional
*cost* but may increase the *price* of the camera - thus
enhancing Canon's margin.

If you ignore the video capture capability of the 5D MkII,
how does it compare as a still camera?

Dana