tyler, your article says you printed at the full 4000ppi. don't epson printers typically print at a native resolution of 360dpi (or is it 720dpi)? i'm trying to understand the relationship of the 4000ppi to the 360dpi. thanks. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: > > It's a logical assumption that the photo surfaces would print with more resolution. The > fact is that the coatings are very different from the clay like material used on matte, and > can't take as much ink. Multi density mono ink methods' ability to deliver as much info > from file to paper as possible depend on being able to put down high ink percentages of > light inks, and decent total ink as well. > So far the photo surface coatings have not performed nearly as well in this regard,so even > many are making satisfying prints on them, they do less well under scrutiny than the best > matte systems. Workers making ink setups even for color run into this difference and > know it well. The best matte coatings do not, even with a textured paper, scatter the inks > as one might imagine, but describe the dots very well. Hope that makes sense. > The photo surface approach is evolving and of course will improve over time. > Hope this helps, it a bit hard to explain without an entire write-up on how the best > systems utilize multi density mono inks, and why it works. > Tyler >
Message
Re: How tiny dots determine real resolution in a B&W ink print
2008-10-03 by c1asia
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.