Yes, Bruce is right. There is another entire project involving native printer/driver resolution, the potential benifits of giving it info at that res, and if so how best to get there. Definitely beyond the scope of those tests. I chose to overwhelm the drivers with info so there could be no doubt about giving them enough, and also make the potential relevance of the file detail essentially moot. Obvioulsy each driver has it's own methods, but I think letting each do it's thing in this case is also part of the evaluation. The intent of the testing was very specific, but implies many other issues beyond it's scope. Tyler http://www.custom-digital.com/ --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Watson <bwyg@...> wrote: > > c1asia wrote: > > tyler, > > > > your article says you printed at the full 4000ppi. don't epson > > printers typically print at a native resolution of 360dpi (or is it > > 720dpi)? i'm trying to understand the relationship of the 4000ppi to > > the 360dpi. thanks. > > > > > One is scanner resolution (4000 spi). One is output resolution to the > printer (360ppi). > -- > Bruce Watson >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: How tiny dots determine real resolution in a B&W ink print
2008-10-03 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.