Hi Tyler, Changing subject somewhat here but I wanted to respond to your last email. Not wanting to pick a nit but I believe that opinions are changing as to whether the highest quality B&W print has to originate from B&W film? I have concluded (as I believe others have also) that the additional data in color captures (digital or transparency) lend themselves to the possibility of better B&W prints then do B&W film? I realize that this may be speculation on my part, but it sure appears that way to me. Nothing wrong with B&W film. I captured that way for many years. Just that now I believe that the Photoshop capabilities available to images that start out life as color can provide many more available expressions then straight B&W from the outset. Just my opinion. Don't want new users to be left with the opinion that you have to start out with B&W film to have a great B&W print. Thanks! Bruce http://BruceVarner.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: > > Well this is the B&W list, and your stated desire was the highest > quality, so one assumes you're shooting B&W film. As Bruce suggests, > for that level of quality larger file sizes are just an accepted >fact of life...........
Message
Re: Getting reasonable scan file sizes w/ MF & LF ...
2008-10-07 by btvarner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.