David Whistance wrote: > > > I'm not sure where this comes from. 16 bits of data gives 2 to the power of > 16 shades of grey, ie 65,536 of them. Should be plenty to divide by 17 > stops, particularly as the relationship between a stop and a set of shades > of grey is arbitrary - you can map them how you like with either the scanner > software or Photoshop. What does surprise me is that Steve gets this from > an Epson V700, however I've seen some of his images and he does undoubtedly > capture a very large SBR with detail at both ends so I'm sure he's right. No one is questioning that David gets a tremendous SBR; it's the specific number that sounds too good to be true. Dynamic range of a sample is limited to log-base-2(#levels). This is a theoretical limit; it assumes a perfect sampling chain. Real-world performance is not going to be as good in general, there's a noise floor in the electronic chain, flare in the optics and limitations in the A/D converter itself. So, in theory, the most that could be represented in a scan is 16 stops; practically speaking, it's probably more like 14 stops. Cheers, Dana
Message
Re: Subject Brightness Range - branch from [Digital BW] Re: Getting reasonable scan file sizes w/ MF & LF ...
2008-10-07 by Dana H. Myers
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.