Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Qimage

2008-10-21 by richardeskin

I have only been using it for a short time but find that their 
sharpening algorithm is right on, I can't do better myself.  Also, 
since I always sharpen after sizing, it is more convenient to use 
Qimage since I don't need to save sharpened images at different 
sizes, nor sharpen each time I resize a saved image.  

I have found it to be a good value and don't regret the purchase.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Richard 
Smallfield <r.smallfield@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have wondered about buying Qimage for a while ... but, being 
pleased with my 
> output, have not been able to justify another software purchase.
> 
> Can anyone give three compelling reasons for getting Qimage? I 
prefer not to 
> upsample much anyway (and tend to shoot 25-35mp images), so their 
improved 
> algorithms may not be that important to me.
> 
> I sometimes print D70 images on 13x19" paper, but even then I'm not 
sure their 
> pyramid interpolation would be worth the extra purchase.
> 
> However, there may be some feature that I've not thought of that is 
really, 
> realy, really, really (really, really) a bit useful.
> 
> thanks,
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> www.richardsmallfield.com
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.