I have only been using it for a short time but find that their sharpening algorithm is right on, I can't do better myself. Also, since I always sharpen after sizing, it is more convenient to use Qimage since I don't need to save sharpened images at different sizes, nor sharpen each time I resize a saved image. I have found it to be a good value and don't regret the purchase. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Richard Smallfield <r.smallfield@...> wrote: > > Hi, > I have wondered about buying Qimage for a while ... but, being pleased with my > output, have not been able to justify another software purchase. > > Can anyone give three compelling reasons for getting Qimage? I prefer not to > upsample much anyway (and tend to shoot 25-35mp images), so their improved > algorithms may not be that important to me. > > I sometimes print D70 images on 13x19" paper, but even then I'm not sure their > pyramid interpolation would be worth the extra purchase. > > However, there may be some feature that I've not thought of that is really, > realy, really, really (really, really) a bit useful. > > thanks, > Richard > > > > www.richardsmallfield.com >
Message
Re: Qimage
2008-10-21 by richardeskin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.