On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:04 AM, dgattarino wrote: > Dear all, > > we finally have come to a conclusion of our R&D program on B&W fine > art printing. We are finally satisfied with the results we got after > 1.5 years of tests. The most difficult part was to achieve at the same > time good Dmax, nice looking prints and archival standard on fine art > printmaking paper. The technique we come up with, Carbon-Gelatine > printing, is described in details on our new website: > http://www.mantinieri.com/techniques.html [snip] > Gelatin based coating is commonly used in art work restoration as > it is easily removed from the substrate without ruining the > underlying art. In fact, immersing the print in a water bath at 40 ° > C is sufficient to liquefy the gelatine and fully removing it from > the paper without any mechanical intervention. After the > restoration, a new coating is easily reapplied whenever necessary. > [quoted from the web site] What changes in the coating might make re-coating necessary, Daniela? And at approximately what intervals would changes in the coating be expected to make re-coating routinely necessary? I'm wondering about the case for gelatine coating vs. no coating. Or perhaps some other coating, not that I have one to recommend; I hope to avoid coating. Thanks. -- Sam
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Time to thanks the Newsgroup
2008-10-28 by Sam McCandless
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.