At 11:46 PM 11/9/2008, you wrote: >Clayton, >because they are normally displayed behind windows anyway, would it >not be better to put them under glass in the direct sun to remove >this contaminant factor? I appreciate that longer would be needed >for the test, however. Or not! Not knowing anything about the mechanism, I can imagine that behavior in a sealed cavity, where any gaseous products are somewhat trapped, might be different. I doubt that this would be so, but would start with an open mind. Arthur Fink A r t h u r . F i n k . P h o t o g r a p h y ------------------------------------------------- Ten New Island Avenue . land 207.766.5722 Peaks Island, Maine 04108 . cell 207.615.5722 www.arthurfinkphoto.com . af@... Buy my Dance! book www.arthurfinkphoto.com/dance Problems with my e-mail address? My provider has been returning some mail as if it were spam! You can address me at arthurfinkphoto@...
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 100 Hour Direct Sun Torture Test
2008-11-10 by Arthur Fink
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.