Digital BW, The Print

Hi Eric,

>I think you are putting more into my suggestions than I. 
>Perhaps it is my platinum printing days and the tests that I ran 
>for it, but a hygrometer is cheap or not even required. I quick 
>look at a site such as AccuWeather, would give you the RH and UV 
>index numbers. Please don't think that I see little or no benefit. 
>What I meant to say was with very little effort, your test could 
>have provided a lot more.   

Understood, thanks.  To be honest, I'm not interested enough to put
that kind of effort into it.  I just wanted to see what would happen
if I put the print in the sun, so I did it.  That's all there was to
it, no grand design or intent to create a scientific test or body of
data.  I'm delighted that prints with my favorite ink/paper can
withstand 100 hours, and logging the exposure time is pretty much the
limit of my scientific patience.  I am curious as to what at point
further deterioration will appear, so I'm continuing the test (the
print got 7 cloudless hours today).


>And as for redoing Ws work, an independent verification of that work 
>would not be a bad thing.  

Isn't that other testing web site that Harold mentioned doing
something like that?

Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
I-Trak 2.1   http://www.cjcom.net/itrak.htm