> > Museum @ 50 Lux for 10 hrs > -------------------------------- > 500 Lux/day -> 182,500 Lux/year > 55 museum years > > > Home/Office @ 450 Lux for 12 hrs > ---------------------------------- > 5400 Lux/day -> 1,971,000 Lux/year > 5 Wilhelm years > > Amazing that a typical home/office environment is that much brighter > (9x) than museum lighting, I never would have guessed that much. > Anyway, W rates unprotected VFA/ABW at 112 years. In museum lighting > that would be about 1200 years. > > If my 100 hrs represents 5 W. years, then it would take about another > 2200 hours to reach 112 W. years. That certainly puts things into > perspective. (someone please correct me if my math is wrong). > > We must remember that W's rating is based on a certain amount of > acceptable change. So it doesn't mean that a print won't show any > changes until that point. I'll continue my testing and will report > back when the image begins to show some changes. As for OBA issues, > I'm wondering if there will be any further changes beyond the barely > noticeable amount we have at this point... > > Any comments? > > > Regards, > Clayton > Hi Clayton, My info came from the info Livik published sometime ago. A friend of his did the work in Southern Califronia. You're located more south than So., Cal. I would assume. So, maybe 5- 10% more exposure? But that's only a guess. I know that my own home only has about 200 Lux on a bright day. Livik published a way to determine the LUX reading for a given location using a lightmeter. I'll dig around and see if I can find it for you. Scott
Message
Re: 100 Hour Direct Sun Torture Test
2008-11-11 by scott_now_coming
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.