John, If I am reading your post correctly, you are saying that as the dyes mix together, that act, is causing them to fade. Any idea what they are doing? And are there tests that were done to predict this fade in relationship to amounts of X amount of A + X amount of B fades at a rate of Y? You can email off list if you wish, but I just find that real intriguing. Eric Neilsen Photo 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 214 827-8301 http://ericneilsenphotography.com SKype ejprinter _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sinar001 Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:00 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 100 Hour Direct Sun Torture Test -Aardenburg South window tests are good indicators on how an "unknown" paper/ink combination will work, when compared to a "known combo". Putting samples in the window without this kind of comparison will not yield very valuable information. (even with a control sample stored in a like situation but in the dark) A low humidity situation with dye inks, will tend to skew results in making you think they are more fade resistant. I don't believe humidity is nearly as important factor with pigmented inks as with dyes. Dye inkjet inks "co-mingle". The prefered papers are swellable polymer, which tend to isolate the droplets, from one another. The co-mingling of dyes, causes premature failure of the weaker dye. Humidity plays a roll, the higher RH, will cause the dyes to migrate even within the swellable polymer ink receptor, again causing pre-mature failure. This complex situation regarding humidity levels is why the major players have all gone to using pigmented inks for "archival" results. John Nollendorfs --- In DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "mccormick.mark59" <mark@...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla <edinkla@> wrote: > > If I do > > not trust a paper that hasn't been tested somewhere else I > > hang half a print in a glass window facing east. That place > > is hardly heated and humidity is usually above 50%. > > Artists' window tests where prints are taped to a window have a lot of infrared (IR) energy > exposure that doesn't occur at locations further into the interior of the building. I have > measured print surface temperatures as high as 54 degrees centigrade (130 deg. F) under > those conditions so desiccation is still very strong even though the print is indoors. > > Best regards, > > Mark > http://www.aardenbu <http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com> rg-imaging.com > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: 100 Hour Direct Sun Torture Test -Aardenburg
2008-11-13 by E Neilsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.