Digital BW, The Print

Hi Tyler,

Txs for trying this on the 1900.
Are you on Mac or PC?
I ran my test on Windows XP.
Also I found it was the same if I tried 1800 or 1900 (1800 was all available
on earlier version of QTR).

Just to be 100% sure you are doing the same as me, can you confirm you are
using the QTR media source "manual roll (rear)".

Txs,

Mike

2008/12/22 Tyler Boley <tyler@...>

>    --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com<DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "Michael King"
> <drmrking@...> wrote:
> >
> ...
> > Are you using the 1900 with QTR?
> > If so can you run a test for me please so I can show Roy that's its
> not just
> > with my 1900 that the single sheet feed doesn't work.
> > Print some text at the top of a sheet of paper from the "manual roll
> rear"
> > single sheet feeder. What should happen is that the paper doesn't
> advance
> > enough and it prints into fresh air. You have to load the paper
> first before
> > printing.
> >
> > Txs,
>
> Mike, well I first have to sheepishly admit that I had neglected to
> take a good look at what came with the printer, and the manual. I've
> gone through so many Epsons I have become a bit assuming about my
> knowledge of them. So I was initially excited that there is this feed
> system for thick papers that may overcome the shortcomings of the 1400
> system.
> However I was not able to make it work from QTR. Works fine from the
> Epson driver when the instructions from the manual are followed. But
> From QTR I just get an immediate flashing feed light when I hit print.
> If I then hit that button, it backs the paper back out and continues
> flashing. The only way I can then proceed is to put the paper up in
> the normal feed mechanism and hit the button again, it then feeds and
> prints from there.
> So, from the back, I'm not even getting what you are, thin air, or on
> paper. There is a new version that states QTR now supports the 1900,
> and that is what I'm using. So, I can confirm rear feed with QTR is
> not working for me, but I can confirm the behavior you describe.
> Tyler
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]