Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: PHOTOGRAPHY-NOW.NET - The Fine Art Photography Directory

2008-12-25 by Andrew Sharpe

I agree, the site is put together quite well. I only have two gripes: 1)
when viewing a portfolio, the site resizes my browser to fit the screen.
This is hubris, and ruins the experience for me, as I have to resize
everything once I'm done viewing, and 2) even though the site resizes my
screen (see #1), the size of the portfolio photos are woefully small to
show off art. None of these artists ever wanted their work to be shown
at 3"x3".

Andrew


On 12/24/2008 09:51 PM, Jane Waters wrote:
> 
> 
> It certainly would be nice to be among such luminaries; however, I
> suspect since THEY (whoever "they" are) make the determination as to
> whether or not we all classify as fine art photographers, there is a
> large number of us who will NOT be included. that being said, however,
> it's a gorgeous site and worth the submission of samples.
> 
> happy holidays, everyone.
> janie
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "robertjonesphotography" <robertjonesphotography@...> wrote:
>>
>> I found a great web site - www.photography-now.net they run a new
>> website for photographers. A directory dedicated to fine art
>> photography, master photographers, contemporary artists and fine art
>> galleries.
>> Many fantastic portfolios by "Big Names" like Ansel Adams, Edward
>> Weston and well known contemporary photographers.
>> I intend to have my portfolio presented on this website.
>> I got curious and wrote a couple of emails to photographers that
>> already have a portfolio on this new platform to find out if they were
>> happy with their portfolio or not.
>> All of them responded absolutely positively to me.
>> Anybody of you also has his portfolio online there?
>> Robert B.Jones
>>
> 
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.