> I keep intending to use a spectroradiometer to take measurements of > gloss and matte prints under glass and determine what the > differential value, or formula, is, but I never seem to have the > time. But the short story is that the difference virtually disappears > when framed under glass. David, I think you may have a problem with a typical spectrophotometer when reading through glass. I was trying to help a friend create profiles for the Diasec process, (image physically and chemically bonded to the back of plexiglass), and reading through the thickness of the plexi or glass definitely skewed readings, sometimes significantly. The thicker the glass or Plexi, the bigger the error. It affected not only color, but density readings. A very thin glass is less noticeable. In this respect, a spectro doesn't seem to act like a spot meter. I agree with most of the statements people have made about matte vs. glossy papers. How they are displayed, whether under glass or not, lighting, reflections, angle of lighting, and even the image, seem make a big difference. The readings are not, in my opinion, indicative of how a matte print will appear compared to a glossy print. I have some matte prints with a Dmax of 1.65 which appear much blacker than the same print on glossy substrates with a Dmax of 2.2 or higher. As the viewing environment changes, so do the relationships. Pretty interesting. I do find, however, that I prefer matte papers with a Dmax above 1.6, and preferably above 1.65-1.7. When the Dmax of matte papers drop into the 1.5's, they typically tend to look a little weak to me. But, I even use them on certain images, especially if the image doesn't live or die based on deep blacks. Also, some matte papers just "look" blacker than other matte papers, even if their Dmax reading is a little lower. Museo Max, for example doens't have the best Dmax, but prints on it look deep and rich to me. Of course, color gamut is another issue, though it may not be as relevant to most people on this forum. I find that for color work, the smaller gamut of matte papers tends to be a bigger issue than even the Dmax. Lou
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Dmax: how much of a difference do I see ?
2008-12-29 by Louis Dina
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.