> 1. Instead of applying Gaussian Blur to the steps before taking > measurements, try the Blur Average and clean up any dust first. Excellent suggestion. Just did this with another paper I was calibrating this evening. Fussiness of moving around the selection rectangle and hitting Ctrl-F to do the average filter was more than made up for in the ease of reading off the L values after doing this. Thanks! > 3. If you are trying to determine the reflection densities of the > output based on the Stouffer, it is only valid if the density range > of the output falls within the range of the Stouffer, which goes up > to Log 2.0. I'm only doing matte papers, so none of them can get up to 2.0 anyway! Thanks for the tips! Ken
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Poor man's densitometer
2009-01-15 by kwalsh74
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.