I would caution not to make the target patches too small. The Spyder3 probe works better (more consistent readings) if the patches are at least 1/2" in size. David Tobey of Data Color also regularly warns users not to be too frugal with the size of the target they print. John Nollendorfs --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Randy Rancier" <randy_rancier2004@...> wrote: > > Thanks for your comments Paul. I ended up painting the outside of the orifice with > "whiteout" making sure not to get any on the inside. It has help greatly placing the sensor > right where I want it. I figured that the "whiteout" would be easy enough to remove if I > ever needed too. > > Randy > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark" <pr_roark@> wrote: > > > > "Randy Rancier" <randy_rancier2004@> wrote: > > > > > The issue I'm having is with reading the "Ink Pattern Page" > > > for QTR is with my densitometer (Spyder3Print); is that > > > each patch or square is so small ... > > > > I have the earlier model and found that if I put a white dot on the > > outside of the read orifice on the side I'm looking at while reading, > > it made it much easier to see what I was doing. > > > > Also for linearization, I use this 21-step test strip: > > http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/21-Step.jpg > > > > The markings at the corners of the test patches, particularly with > > the dot on the read orifice, help me center the spetro. > > > > I use the Calibration mode prints only for ink limits and relative > > density. It's usually obvious when making these readings if you've > > hit some white paper. You can always make a couple reads to make > > sure. > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > > >
Message
Re: QTR Questions about Linearizing and reading patches???
2009-01-28 by sinar001
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.