Search the archives for Lyson Quads or Small Gamut. Comments there. Not good. Horrible metamerism. Avoid in my opinion. j --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Richard Smallfield <r.smallfield@...> wrote: > > Hi Greg, > here's the Lyson page for the Quad Black ink: > http://www.lyson.com/photo/product_details.asp?id=3 > > Is there anyone with experience who can comment on this inkset? > > Richard > > At 08:45 a.m. Monday 9/02/2009, you wrote: > > >Greg wrote: > >> I've been out of the loop for a while, just wondering if there has > >> been any improvement on the dye ink front. > > > >Wouldn't it be nice to have a monochrome dye ink set? Solve all our > >problems but one -- longevity. But supposedly you can get a pretty long > >lived dye -- we should be able to beat the dyes in C prints for example > >since that technology is so old. It sure would solve the matte / glossy > >dilemma too -- excellent Dmax on either paper without changing inks. > >Eliminate the need for GLOP. Improved surface properties like scuff > >resistance. Less clogging. All that. > > > >So... where *are* the monochrome dye inks? Or the full color dye inks? > >Should solve the dark gamut width problems too, along with the other > >advantages listed above. > > -- > www.richardsmallfield.com > > "Men are conservatives when they are least vigorous, > or when they are most luxurious. They are conservatives > after dinner." > --Ralph Waldo Emerson >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Third party dye inks
2009-02-09 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.