James Irelan wrote: > yeah? I don't know the name Nazdar... wonder if they destroy > printers, too... : ) Nazdar used to be a supplier of silkscreen products and probably still is. At the time they bought Lyson it must have been for their (Eco) solvent inks, the sublimation inks etc. For a short period Lyson build a reputation with its inks for Iris printers, when the switch to Epson models started they made a mess of that reputation in the pro field, they continued to sell a lot to people that were less well informed. After Wilhelm proved they were bad the ads in Europe for Fotonic ink contained at least a year longer the same misleading information on fade resistance . Their web pages on fade resistance stayed much longer and had a reader confusing mix from results done by Lysonic on 6 ink models and Fotonic on 4 ink models. I have often warned about that. Forget Lyson in general. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Third party dye inks
2009-02-09 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.