Daniel. In my opinion, Iris prints should also be called 'inkjet' as well, and it was only because Iris was first, way before there was a 'category' to put them into, that they got their own classification.. Harvey Ferdschneider partner, SKID Photography, NYC Daniel Perez wrote: > I'm curious, how do you feel about inkjet prints that > come our of an Iris printer? They call them "Iris > prints" with pride. It's a name brand that has come > to also describe the print itself! (do you know > anyone who makes iris prints and just calls them > "inkjet prints"?) > In that case we could call our prints "Epson prints!" > Ha.. except for the fact that everyone and their mom > has an Epson. > Remember when a xerox was something that came out of > a Xerox machine? > > Daniel > > > --- SKID Photography <skid@...> wrote: > > It's *so* much better than using the actual > > descriptive term 'inkjet print' > > that's cheap and tawdry (according to some). > > > > Who kidding whom here? > > > > Harvey Ferdschneider > > partner, SKID Photography, NYC > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Running into inkjet work....
2002-02-12 by SKID Photography
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.