Hi,
I don't know how many prints you sell in France but, hey, if it
really offends you...
> Yeah, and I really *want* to call my prints some word that lots of
people
> consider rude.
But it isn't
> It's *so* much better than using the actual descriptive
term 'inkjet print'
No it's not
> that's cheap and tawdry (according to some).
>
That's true ( according to some ) but doesn't that ('cheap and
tawdry') mean the same as 'rude'?
> Who kidding whom here?
I don't think anyone is kidding anyone
The point I am making is that you call your artwork what you care to,
regardless of the opinion of others or their mis-use of language. The
fact is that this method (whatever you wish to call it) of producing
artwork is relatively new and squabbles inside the media are bound to
occurr. It's healthy and produces ideas and growth.
If we need to coin a phrase to legitamise the process we have chosen,
it may as well be one which will enable the reactionary art world to
hang work with a light heart. After all it's the work that is the
important thing here, not the process.
Let's stop being pedantic about process and get on with producing
breathtaking images which would be valid regardless.
David HMessage
[Digital BW] Re: Running into inkjet work....
2002-02-12 by davidhatton2000
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.