Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Displaying prints without glass...

2009-02-16 by Mark Rogers

If you are not worried about archival then it is not a problem. A 
couple other issues you might run into over time is that you may need 
to replace the mat every now and then since it may buckle over time 
and depending on where you are hanging them you may need to worry 
about finger prints. Another option to consider is non-glare glass or 
acrylic. It is much less expensive than anti-reflective but it can 
cause a slight loss of sharpness (excessive loss of sharpness and 
fuzziness if you get a low quality version). 

Cheers,
Mark 
Frame Destination, Inc.
http://blog.framedestination.com
http://www.framedestination.com
http://www.pbase.com/lila161


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "kwalsh74" 
<kwalsh74@...> wrote:
>
> I'm using one of Paul's 100% carbon printing processes on matte 
papers
> to make prints to decorate the house.  Getting decent anti-
reflective
> glass is very expensive and since the lighting isn't controlled
> (mostly windows and such, but no direct sun light) glare is awful
> behind glass.  So I'm thinking of displaying them framed and matted
> without any glass.
> 
> Anyone see a major problem with this?
> 
> I know this is not archival, but I'd presume I'd change out the 
prints
> every few years anyway.
> 
> Hit them with compressed air to get dust off every so often?
> 
> Should I spray the prints with something to protect them?
> 
> Any advice greatly appreciated!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>   Ken
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.