Disclaimer/background: * I lurk here 99.9% of the time * I'm a hobbiest, not a pro (I do BW for personal use, friends; definitely not in the fine art league) * Print proofs at home on an HP inkjet; use MPIX or WHCC to make large BW prints * Have used all "convert to BW" methods using Photoshop that I've ever found, e.g., use best of individual channels via layer masks, channel mixer, calculations, BW adjustment layer, Gorman, multiple hue/sat layers, L channel, etc., and many 3rd party plugins (free and $$) * Written numerous PS actions to reduce labor intensity * Used to spend hours converting a given image to BW When SEP first came out I was on the side of those who rightfully asked, "Why pay for a plugin to do what you can do in PS, especially for THAT MUCH money?" But then favorable reports from "real people" (not flowery, seldom critical BS reviews found in mags and commercial websites) started showing up on various forums. Since NIK offered a fully functional 15- day trial, I decided to give it a shot. In short order I was very impressed. I ended up purchasing it for my school-age son (33% educational discount) and installing on his computer. I use this plugin almost every day. I still use methods noted above for comparison purposes; 90%+ of the time I end up going with output from SEP, either by itself or in combination with results from another process. I also suggest doing the download trial thing. Seeing is believing. YMWV. Danny --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "atrembly2001" <atrembly@...> wrote: > if anyone in the group has used Nik Silver Efex Pro and what their experience has been.
Message
Re: Nik Silver Efex Pro
2009-02-18 by Danny Raphael
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.