I agree with Bruce. Ted's test was very unscientific, a matter of taste mostly. And the reference to the crappy Epson scanner he used might not help. He admits that it was an "exercise within reason". I think each person would have to do a head on comparison with a file the way they print (with their equipment and RIP if used) and the way Digital Silver prints to get a valid result. I have seen Eric's prints and they do look good, but they are a different breed, and one should not assume them to match. Apples and oranges. Mark http://www.stillrivereditions.com On Apr 6, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Bruce Watson wrote: > Tyler Boley wrote: >> http://www.teddillard.com/2009/04/digital-silver-printing.html >> >> Tyler > Yes. Interesting that the inkjet print is noticeably sharper, even > using > the Epson driver and the color K3 inks. With the Durst's hype I would > have thought they'd have done enough work to at least win sharpness. > But > that's not what I see shown here. Odd, that. > > What Mr. Dillard complains about is the tonality, especially in the > highlights. This I find to be a problem with the Epson driver and > the K3 > inks. I think he would get much better and smoother highlights using a > better driver (StudioPrint, QTR) and at least quadtone inks but > especially using K7s. > > That in my mind would be a "fair" comparison. Using color inks to make > B&W prints has always been a lower quality solution, but a more > flexible > one if one refuses for whatever reasons to dedicate a printer to B&W. > -- > Bruce Watson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish > to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the > Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE > “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE > LOSSES (EVEN IF THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR > ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; > OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO > GROUP. > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] another interesting digital output comparison- ink and silver
2009-04-06 by Mark Savoia
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.