> Lightroom as opposed to other conversion software, simply because > everyone I know has their library in Lightroom, not, say, Aperture. Thank you. I used to use Dxo a lot, but it's much heavier. For whatever reason (silly) I am OK at LR storing the settings in its database, but not at DXO doing the same. I now use Dxo only for images that have lots of noise. In that field I think it still outshines PS and LR Ciao, Marco
Message
Re: DSLR Convert
2009-04-11 by the_mark_pv